<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OurFirstMarriage #81: Creepy Massages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ourfirstmarriage.com/index.php/2008/05/26/ourfirstmarriage-81-creepy-massages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ourfirstmarriage.com/index.php/2008/05/26/ourfirstmarriage-81-creepy-massages/</link>
	<description>Two Parents. Two Kids. One Marriage. Our First Marriage The podcast for parents, by parents and about parenting, childrearing, love, and life. We are providing our half of this conversation; we would love to hear what you have to say. Podcasts update on Wednesday. But most of all, Listen to Your Child!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:22:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.ourfirstmarriage.com/index.php/2008/05/26/ourfirstmarriage-81-creepy-massages/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 19:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourfirstmarriage.com/?p=189#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bob for listening and for the suggestion. While I don&#039;t think we are opposed to the idea, often we are just letting the conversation flow. I know that often we start off with a pretty clear idea of what we want to talk about and at the end, look down at our notes and realize that we started where we wanted but ended up someplace completely different. From someone &quot;over the pond&quot; so to speak (I love that term), I&#039;m sure some of the more &quot;local&quot; topics aren&#039;t as appealing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bob for listening and for the suggestion. While I don&#8217;t think we are opposed to the idea, often we are just letting the conversation flow. I know that often we start off with a pretty clear idea of what we want to talk about and at the end, look down at our notes and realize that we started where we wanted but ended up someplace completely different. From someone &#8220;over the pond&#8221; so to speak (I love that term), I&#8217;m sure some of the more &#8220;local&#8221; topics aren&#8217;t as appealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigbob</title>
		<link>http://www.ourfirstmarriage.com/index.php/2008/05/26/ourfirstmarriage-81-creepy-massages/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>bigbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourfirstmarriage.com/?p=189#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry no negative comments from us!  My wife and I are regular listens from England and enjoy your shows.  We have an 18 month and a second on the way, so particularly enjoy hearing about your trials and tribulations of bringing up the kids.  Which leads to the point I was originally going to post... as you have two shows a week and moreorless talk 50% about your kids and 50% about other topics, why not devote one show a week to the kids and one to everything else?  Just a suggestion, keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry no negative comments from us!  My wife and I are regular listens from England and enjoy your shows.  We have an 18 month and a second on the way, so particularly enjoy hearing about your trials and tribulations of bringing up the kids.  Which leads to the point I was originally going to post&#8230; as you have two shows a week and moreorless talk 50% about your kids and 50% about other topics, why not devote one show a week to the kids and one to everything else?  Just a suggestion, keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
